View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Tue May 30, 2017 11:02 am



Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
 Removed RDL objects, which alternative should I use ? 
Author Message

Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2015 12:21 pm
Posts: 2
I am studying the article "Mapping of a functional design of a control loop"
In the appended rdf-file "control-loop.rdf", in the definition for the function blocks FT-5703, FIC 5703, FPV-5703, etc.

for example
<!-- Declaration of FT-5703 -->
<dm:ClassOfFunctionalObject rdf:ID="C2df9a810-c872-11e3-9c1a-0800200c9a66">
<rdf:type rdf:resource="&owl;Class"/>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="&rdl;RDS6409401"/> <!-- CONTROL FUNCTION BLOCK IN-A -->
<skos:prefLabel>FT-5703</skos:prefLabel>
<meta:valEffectiveDate rdf:datatype="&xsd;dateTime">2013-09-15T13:29:00Z</meta:valEffectiveDate>
</dm:ClassOfFunctionalObject>

I do not find the reference e.g. "RDS6409401" for <!-- CONTROL FUNCTION BLOCK IN-A -->
at "http://data.posccaesar.org/rdl/" or in the downloaded file "RDL.owl"

Are all the RDS for CONTROL FUNCTION BLOCK IN-A, CONTROL FUNCTION BLOCK OUT-A, CONTROL FUNCTION BLOCK CS, etc. as mentioned in the document "Mapping of a functional design of a control loop" discarded ?
Which RDS can I take for the function blocks CONTROL FUNCTION BLOCK IN-A, CONTROL FUNCTION BLOCK OUT-A, CONTROL FUNCTION BLOCK CS, etc.

I ask since I want to study the RDL, I think it is one of the barrier that make troubles to the user, who want to apply ISO 15926: poorly documented, changed without any notation

Thank

Nguyen


Tue Mar 24, 2015 2:33 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 1 post ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software.