|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 1 post ] |
|
Removed RDL objects, which alternative should I use ?
Author |
Message |
Hdnguyen
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2015 12:21 pm Posts: 2
|
I am studying the article "Mapping of a functional design of a control loop" In the appended rdf-file "control-loop.rdf", in the definition for the function blocks FT-5703, FIC 5703, FPV-5703, etc.
for example <!-- Declaration of FT-5703 --> <dm:ClassOfFunctionalObject rdf:ID="C2df9a810-c872-11e3-9c1a-0800200c9a66"> <rdf:type rdf:resource="&owl;Class"/> <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="&rdl;RDS6409401"/> <!-- CONTROL FUNCTION BLOCK IN-A --> <skos:prefLabel>FT-5703</skos:prefLabel> <meta:valEffectiveDate rdf:datatype="&xsd;dateTime">2013-09-15T13:29:00Z</meta:valEffectiveDate> </dm:ClassOfFunctionalObject>
I do not find the reference e.g. "RDS6409401" for <!-- CONTROL FUNCTION BLOCK IN-A --> at "http://data.posccaesar.org/rdl/" or in the downloaded file "RDL.owl"
Are all the RDS for CONTROL FUNCTION BLOCK IN-A, CONTROL FUNCTION BLOCK OUT-A, CONTROL FUNCTION BLOCK CS, etc. as mentioned in the document "Mapping of a functional design of a control loop" discarded ? Which RDS can I take for the function blocks CONTROL FUNCTION BLOCK IN-A, CONTROL FUNCTION BLOCK OUT-A, CONTROL FUNCTION BLOCK CS, etc.
I ask since I want to study the RDL, I think it is one of the barrier that make troubles to the user, who want to apply ISO 15926: poorly documented, changed without any notation
Thank
Nguyen
|
Tue Mar 24, 2015 2:33 pm |
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 1 post ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|