Hi Victor,

You are right, but I used rdf:type instead of the Classification relationship in order not to clutter the diagram too much.

But other than that you agree with the diagram?

Regards,
Hans

I propose the following: Name: ClassifiedIdentificationOfClassInLanguage Intent: Identification of a class with a string, classified with a natural language, according a given type of identification (e.g. ASME Code). Description: ClassifiedIdentificationOfClassIn Language(x1, x2, x3, x4) means that ...

If I had used any other example, like ASME Code or the like, then it would be OK with you? But having used the example of RDL Unique Name is still useful, because it raises the question what to do when subRDLs are being produced in another language? Are we then editing the RDL records by adding annU...

ClassifiedIdentificationOfClass.png I propose the following: Name: ClassifiedIdentificationOfClass Intent: Identification of a class with a string, according a given type of identification (e.g. RDL Unique Name). Description: ClassifiedIdentificationOfClass(x1, x2, x3) means that x1 is a [class], x...

Dear MMT members, I propose a high-level data model, covering a plant from conceptual process design to a real-world implementation, for your approval. The documentation can be found at http://15926.org/publications/general-discussions/plant-lifecycle-model/index.htm . Please respond via this forum ...