Hans,
It looks rather strange. You are naming ClassOfPart as ActuatorType while it is really a pattern parameter.
Should be the following:
T0002C(OOI, VAR1, ActuatorType) ↔
ClassOfInanimatePhysicalObject(OOI) ∧
SpecializationOfClassOfIndividual(
http://posccaesar.org/rdl/RDS418769, VAR1) ∧
Classification(ActuatorType,
http://posccaesar.org/rdl/RDS1458732011) ∧
ClassOfAssemblyDefinition(OOI, VAR1, RDS_new_0007, RDS_new_0007) ∧
SpecializationOfClassOfIndividual(VAR1, ActuatorType) .
Some remarks.
Looks like we need to bring all internal constants of the pattern to the signature. Otherwise I can not see how we will be able to deal with proliferation of parts, streams, etc. So we bring in VAR1, specialization of ACTUATOR class. And ActuatorType itself is part of the signature. We need a definition, not an example.
ActuatorType we can restrict by the ACTUATOR CLASS useful for verification. By the way, we need plain Classification template (two roles, nothing fancy) for this.
Similar story for individuals:
T0002I(x, y, ActuatorType) ↔
PhysicalObject(x) ∧
ClassificationOfIndividual(y,
http://posccaesar.org/rdl/RDS418769) ∧
Classification(ActuatorType,
http://posccaesar.org/rdl/RDS1458732011) ∧
AssemblyOfAnIndividual(x, y) ∧
ClassificationOfIndividual(y, ActuatorType) .