Search found 185 matches
- Sun May 24, 2015 12:41 pm
- Forum: Templates
- Topic: Template Model revisited
- Replies: 2
- Views: 15472
Re: Template Model revisited
Since our new member emmagia brought this up in the topic 'acronyms' I want to give this topic of the template model another kick. We need to discuss the template model as it is defined in Part 8. To me, as voiced by me already in 2012, that model is flawed. I propose to discuss http://www.15926.org...
- Sun May 24, 2015 11:52 am
- Forum: Templates
- Topic: Entity type acronyms
- Replies: 3
- Views: 19086
Re: Entity type acronyms
@emmagia - This topic is simply about acronyms, nothing more.
- Mon Dec 08, 2014 12:08 pm
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Life Cycle of a Class
- Replies: 1
- Views: 13975
Re: Life Cycle of a Class
The classification relationships that give the whole-life individual its aspects, through transitive inheritance of its temporal parts, [HT] Most information is defined in ways that are not that of classification. That's why we have templates. And the transitivity of the relationship (ClassOf)Tempo...
- Sun Aug 24, 2014 9:27 pm
- Forum: Geometry Discussion Forum
- Topic: Styling using ISO15926 Part templates and SVG/CSS?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 28875
Re: Styling using ISO15926 Part templates and SVG/CSS?
Here is the code as I think it should be: <!-- Style Class declaration --> <dm:ClassOfInformationPresentation rdf:about="MyEquipmentLayerStyle"> <rdf:type rdf:resource="&owl;Class"/> </dm:ClassOfInformationPresentation> <!-- Style Class definition --> <tpl:PresentationDetails rdf:about="T07184c90-21...
- Sun Aug 24, 2014 9:08 pm
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Nullifying Values in Part7/8
- Replies: 25
- Views: 58249
Re: Nullifying Values in Part7/8
@Andy
xsi:nil isn't valid RDF, unfortunately.
You might add the use of an unrealistic number, such as '99999'.
I don't know why scales should be NULL. On each project that is well known.
xsi:nil isn't valid RDF, unfortunately.
You might add the use of an unrealistic number, such as '99999'.
I don't know why scales should be NULL. On each project that is well known.
- Fri Aug 01, 2014 8:07 am
- Forum: Templates
- Topic: TIPs revisited
- Replies: 21
- Views: 56988
Re: TIPs revisited
Now we have reached this point, I want to re-emphasize the need for generic patterns. In this case these generic patterns would be ClassifiedPartOfClassOfAssembly and ClassifiedPartOfAssembly, or something like that. ClassifiedPartOfClassOfAssembly(OOI, PartType) ↔ ClassOfInanimatePhysicalObject(OOI...
- Thu Jul 31, 2014 11:09 am
- Forum: Templates
- Topic: TIPs revisited
- Replies: 21
- Views: 56988
Re: TIPs revisited
Yes, that is what Andy said as well, and what I did in http://www.15926.org/publications/templates/TIPs/TIP0009.htm . But that means that those extra OOIs, that are not represented in the source software, have to be generated in some way, and that seems to be the problem. Any OOI could, in an RDF en...
- Thu Jul 31, 2014 9:06 am
- Forum: Templates
- Topic: TIPs revisited
- Replies: 21
- Views: 56988
Re: TIPs revisited
Yep: T0002C(OOI, ActuatorType) ↔ ClassOfInanimatePhysicalObject(OOI) ∧ ClassOfInanimatePhysicalObject(Actuator) ∧ ClassOfInanimatePhysicalObject(ActuatorType) ∧ ClassOfAssemblyDefinition(OOI, Actuator, RDS_new_0007, RDS_new_0007) ∧ SpecializationOfClassOfIndividual(Actuator, ActuatorType) ∧ Speciali...
- Wed Jul 30, 2014 5:17 pm
- Forum: Templates
- Topic: TIPs revisited
- Replies: 21
- Views: 56988
Re: TIPs revisited
Aha, now I see! That is indeed kind of stupid of me. It should read: T0002C(OOI, ActuatorType) ↔ ClassOfInanimatePhysicalObject(OOI) ∧ ∃ActuatorType( ClassOfInanimatePhysicalObject(ActuatorType) ∧ ClassOfAssemblyDefinition(OOI, ActuatorType, RDS_new_0007, RDS_new_0007) ∧ SpecializationOfClassOfIndiv...
- Wed Jul 30, 2014 7:55 am
- Forum: Templates
- Topic: TIPs revisited
- Replies: 21
- Views: 56988
Re: TIPs revisited
Victor, It is interesting that you say that Acuator Type is the "target" (whatever is meant with that) of this TIP. It shows how ill-defined TIPs are, because to me that target is the actuated device (e.g. control valve), with as a second possibility the actuator itself. The "parameter" Actuator Typ...