Search found 6 matches
- Thu May 30, 2013 8:43 pm
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Identification of templates
- Replies: 20
- Views: 51516
Re: Identification of templates
Hi Victor, You are right about the typed node elements, you are applying an abbreviation for describing the typed nodes, but in this case we do not use the rdf:type property. (http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/) We can not use OWL reasoner/verifier software now. However, we aim to achieve this strateg...
- Tue May 21, 2013 3:51 pm
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Identification of templates
- Replies: 20
- Views: 51516
Re: Identification of templates
Hi Victor, I saw your sample of template definition and template instance. I have some comments: At the Classification template, we have this code: <p7tm:TemplateDescription rdf:about="#Classification__desc"> <rdf:type rdf:resource="&owl;Thing" /> <p7tm:valNumberOfRoles rdf:datatype="&xsd;integer">2...
- Wed Nov 14, 2012 1:44 pm
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Namespaces: does a namespace URI need to be short?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 17167
Re: Namespaces: does a namespace URI need to be short?
Vote Option: No
Justification: It can be argued that namespaces should ultimately focus on human readability. If this implies long strings, as we see is a possibility in our dilema, I believe we could optimize transport and storage of URI's at software level.
Justification: It can be argued that namespaces should ultimately focus on human readability. If this implies long strings, as we see is a possibility in our dilema, I believe we could optimize transport and storage of URI's at software level.
- Wed Nov 14, 2012 1:37 pm
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Namespaces: ISO 15926 Part information in namespaces?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 16493
Re: Namespaces: ISO 15926 Part information in namespaces?
Vote Option: No
Justification: I think that short namespaces just with the main information are enough, and we can garantee the
compatibility with the existing namespaces by software.
Justification: I think that short namespaces just with the main information are enough, and we can garantee the
compatibility with the existing namespaces by software.
- Wed Nov 14, 2012 1:34 pm
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Which namespace(s) should exist for Entity Data Types?
- Replies: 15
- Views: 38887
Re: Which namespace(s) should exist for Entity Data Types?
Vote Option: dm: only one namespace for entities, a separate dm: Justification: At my point of view, we need a separate dm: that will be namespaces of the entities, because: 1- The nature of the elements of dm: are different from the rdl: 2 - If we merge dm: and rdl: new users of the standard may lo...
- Fri May 25, 2012 3:54 pm
- Forum: Archive
- Topic: Class Model
- Replies: 27
- Views: 57525
Re: Class Model
Dear MMT member, To contemplate the presented model, as Victor Agroskin told(Message May 16) the template for the class CompositionOfOIM will have a template statement as a role in a template and It is not complience with part 7. I was thinking that the Templates Statements would be conected by Clas...