Victor,
The SIG will be revising the Geometry Model Clarification document next week to address the issue you raise.
Search found 6 matches
- Thu Jan 10, 2013 3:45 pm
- Forum: Generic Geometry Issues
- Topic: Some questions on Geometry Model Clarification document
- Replies: 6
- Views: 23973
- Thu Dec 06, 2012 3:43 pm
- Forum: Generic Geometry Issues
- Topic: Some questions on Geometry Model Clarification document
- Replies: 6
- Views: 23973
Re: Some questions on Geometry Model Clarification document
Victor, We have discussed your comment in today's SIG meeting. The intention is to have a single template that represents an Abstract Object (such as a BoundedFiniteSurface). The statement ClassOfAbstractObject(Class BoundedFiniteSurface) is intended to classify the abstract object represented by th...
- Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:56 pm
- Forum: Generic Geometry Issues
- Topic: Some questions on Geometry Model Clarification document
- Replies: 6
- Views: 23973
Re: Some questions on Geometry Model Clarification document
Thanks Victor. The SIG is not meeting this week due to holidays, but it will discuss and respond at the next SIG meeting.
- Thu Nov 15, 2012 4:21 pm
- Forum: Generic Geometry Issues
- Topic: Some questions on Geometry Model Clarification document
- Replies: 6
- Views: 23973
Re: Some questions on Geometry Model Clarification document
Victor, thanks for your comments. Here are the Geometry SIG team's preliminary responses. 1) We have revised the notes in question as follows to be more clear. - If a word appears in underlined, bold camel case in green it is an existing class in the JORD RDL. - If a word appears in bold camel case ...
- Tue Nov 06, 2012 7:35 pm
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Which namespace(s) should exist for Entity Data Types?
- Replies: 15
- Views: 37983
Re: Which namespace(s) should exist for Entity Data Types?
I agree with "dm only". IMHO, the RDL punning just causes unnecessary confusion. I have not seen any mention of the existing IDS-ADI dm: URI's, e.g. http://dm.rdlfacade.org/data#Activity. We have been using these for the last several years. They will not resolve after rdlfacade.org is shut down, but...
- Thu Jun 28, 2012 9:22 pm
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Modelling Property Ranges in Part7 and Part8
- Replies: 25
- Views: 35451
Re: Modelling Property Ranges in Part7 and Part8
Hi Hans, Quote: 2) Equipment has Operating Pressure Range; Here its entirely possible we would only have one of the values, typically the Upper Limit [HT] Then be specific and use a template with only an upper limit: http://www.infowebml.ws/TS/TS-details/TemplatesForIndirectProperty.htm#ClassOfIndir...